The defamation case of Zachary Young versus CNN has taken an unexpected turn, with Judge William S. Henry delivering a stinging rebuke to lawyers on both sides for their apparent lack of professionalism. “This isn’t kindergarten,” Judge Henry remarked sharply. “You all matriculated from kindergarten a long, long, long time ago, or at least that’s what it says because you all have bar licenses.” His words echoed the growing public frustration with legal theatrics and the erosion of decorum in high-profile cases.
Zachary Young, a U.S. Navy veteran who gained attention for his efforts to assist Afghan citizens during the chaotic U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, has accused CNN of defamation. He alleges that a segment on “The Lead with Jake Tapper” aired on November 11, 2021, misrepresented his actions and harmed his reputation. The case is being closely monitored as it raises significant questions about the boundaries of free speech and the responsibilities of media organizations.
During Wednesday’s proceedings, tensions flared as lawyers clashed over document disclosures and procedural issues. Devin Freedman, representing Young, expressed frustration about a security clearance issue affecting his client and alleged that CNN’s legal team had created an “untenable situation” by withholding key documents until late in the trial.
CNN’s attorney, David L. Axelrod, countered these claims, calling Freedman’s allegations “far-fetched” and arguing that the plaintiff’s team failed to produce necessary documents during discovery. Axelrod further defended a contested subpoena issued to a witness, explaining, “The problem is you can’t list somebody as an impeachment witness, because then you tell the other side exactly what you’re going to do.”
Judge Henry didn’t mince words in addressing the escalating disputes. “I’m tired of these blatant misrepresentations,” he declared. “It seems like everyone wanted to do everything at the last minute without telling the other side.” Raising the fine for personal insults from $100 to $1,000, Henry made it clear he’s had enough of what he described as “shenanigans.”
The judge’s critique extended to the broader legal culture, highlighting the procedural chaos often seen in high-stakes trials. “You all may lawyer like that in Philly, or New York, or D.C., or wherever the heck it is, or Miami. We don’t lawyer like this around here,” he said pointedly.
This case arrives at a time when trust in legacy media is on the decline, with organizations like CNN under increasing scrutiny. The outcome could have far-reaching implications, not only for media accountability but also for the broader debate on free speech. For now, the trial continues, with more evidence and witnesses expected in the coming days.
